Donors break malaria promises
Almost every promise made by rich donors to stop the rampant devastation malaria is causing in Africa has become a piece of paper on a shelf, according to Jeffrey Sachs special advisor to United Nations Secretary General Koffi Anan.
Sachs, who is also the director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University in New York, said the biggest limiting factor of public health in Africa was money.
“There is very little follow through of help for the poor,” Sachs told journalists during a teleconference from Boston.
The UN General Assembly is meeting this week to review progress in controlling the global malaria crisis which has claimed the lives of almost a million, mostly poor women and children in Africa this year.
In April 2000, at Africa’s first presidential summit entirely dedicated to the impact of malaria, world leaders signed a pledge promising action.
This week’s meeting revealed that many Heads of State and donor agencies had not honored the very specific promises made amid great global fanfare in Abuja, Nigeria.
These included lifting mosquito net taxes, expanding access to mosquito nets and access to effective treatment drugs, as well as a $500-million commitment from the World Bank to fight malaria.
“There has been a great deal of political attention in terms of conferences, but the actual responses have been inadequate,” Sachs said. Despite a promise to drop mosquito net taxes, 26 countries were still charging taxes on treated mosquito nets. This included South Africa.
Leaders also promised to ensure by 2005 that at least 60% of those at risk of malaria, particularly pregnant women and children under five years, benefit from the most suitable combination of personal and community protective measures such as insecticide treated mosquito nets and other interventions which are accessible and affordable to prevent infection and suffering.
Currently in 24 countries the use of treated nets for children under five years is at or below five percent. The third promise involved making effective drugs available to 60% of malaria patients by 2005. It was found that although 56% of children under five years had been treated with an anti-malarial, most were treated with chloroquine, an ineffective drug.
This is because the parasite has grown resistant to many anti-malarial drugs. Sachs said chloroquine cost 5 cents (US) per regimen while the effective Artemisinin regimen cost between U$1 and U$2.
“Cost and price is not as a big issue as it is with the anti-AIDS drugs. Yes, we need to produce the drugs as cheaply as possible, but currently it is affordable,” Sachs said.
But it has not only been countries that have failed the poor. A promise by the World Bank to donate U$500-million toward the eradication of the disease has not been met.
“The bank has come nowhere near meeting this pledge,” Sachs said. Among donor countries only Ireland had paid in full its entire pledge to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and malaria. Only U$500-million of new resources has been pledged to the Global Fund in all of 2002.
“I am not confident at all that we are going to solve this soon. It is a daily struggle to connect words with actions,” Sachs said.
Author
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Donors break malaria promises
by Anso Thom, Health-e News
November 6, 2002