Politics interferes at UNGASS
Gabon led African negotiators this week in thrashing out the text of a UN review of implementation of the 2001 Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS.
However, activists accuse the oil-producing country of ignoring a common African position agreed last month in Abuja, Nigeria, and are scrambling to persuade other countries to join Nigeria in publicly objecting to the new interpretation.
Nigeria is the only African country that has openly spoken out against the undermining of the commitments made by African leaders during the Abuja meeting to review progress in implementing the 2001 Abuja Declaration on AIDS, TB and Malaria.
“The latest draft [UNGASS] declaration looks really bad from a civil society perspective – it’s a regression compared with the 2001 document,” said Fatima Hassan of South Africa’s Treatment Action Campaign. “The problem is, negotiations have been taking place by [a Gabonese delegation] that doesn’t really understand issues of HIV/AIDS.”
Gabon, with the support of some Muslim countries, has opposed reference to specific vulnerable groups in the draft declaration, including men who have sex with men, commercial sex workers, and women and young girls.20
“It fears gay men and sex workers demonstrating in the streets,”
commented Abdelkader Bacha of the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, adding: “There is no deep thinking here.”
Gabon, sandwiched between Congo and Cameroon, is a member of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, an inter-governmental organisation of 57 largely Muslim states.
As current chair of the African Union (AU), Gabon automatically assumed leadership of the continent’s negotiations during the UN’s three-day high-level meeting on HIV/AIDS.
With the support of South Africa, Gabon has also sought to exclude targets in the 2006 draft declaration, including the Abuja commitment to reach 80 percent of people needing AIDS treatment by 2010.
“South Africa is obstructing the inclusion of targets – it doesn’t want to be accountable. It says the issue is quality [of services], not quantity [of people on treatment],” said Hassan.
Negotiations on reviewing the UN General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (UNGASS) have taken a back seat for some African delegations in New York, who seem to be more focused on Darfur and the coming elections in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
“Our states have behaved in the most shocking fashion – people were not attending the negotiations”, remarked Sisonke Msimang, HIV/AIDS programme manager for the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA).
“Our missions have been complacent and disorganised at best, and in the case of Gabon and South Africa, obstructionist.”
PlusNews was unable to get comment from the Gabon country delegation.
According to Omololu Falobi, executive director of Journalists against AIDS Nigeria, the danger is that “not only are we going to lose out on UNGASS, but also on Abuja. It means the past five years of work in Africa would have been fruitless.”
African NGOs have joined global civil society groups in warning that the entire General Assembly review process lacks vision, and risks delivering an empty declaration that does not move substantially beyond what was agreed at UNGASS five years ago.
They want to see reference to treatment – absent from the 2001 document
– with time-bound targets linked to additional financing, recognition of the impact of violence against women, and the needs of injecting drug users and other specific vulnerable groups.
“The fear is that we have a piece of paper that is bland; that doesn’t move us forward in any way. Five years on, there are important things that should be on the agenda, like universal access [a comprehensive package of care, treatment and support],” said Msimang.
This article appeared at www.plusnews.org
For additional information on the UN High Level Meeting on HIV/AIDS:
http://www.plusnews.org/UNGASS.asp
Author
Health-e News is South Africa's dedicated health news service and home to OurHealth citizen journalism. Follow us on Twitter @HealtheNews
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Politics interferes at UNGASS
by Health-e News, Health-e News
June 2, 2006