Big tobacco’s challenge to smoking act fails
The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from Batsa against an earlier judgement by the North Gauteng High Court which ruled that a ban on tobacco advertising was constitutional.
‘Batsa’s plan to addict new generations of teenagers to nicotine suffered a bloody nose in the courts,’ said the National Council Against Smoking (NCAS). ‘This is a victory for the youth of South Africa.’
In his judgement Justice Mthiyane ruled that given the enormous health risks, economic harms, and clear evidence that tobacco advertising increases tobacco sales the government had a responsibility to ban tobacco advertising.
‘There can be no question that the government has a responsibility to protect its citizens from the ravages of tobacco,’ said Justice Mthiyane. ‘Prohibition on the advertising and promotion of tobacco is reasonable and justified’.
Batsa’s application that the court overrule Parliament by interpreting the Tobacco Products Control Act so as to allow it to continue to advertise tobacco on a one-to-one basis was also rejected. The court felt that this would allow a continuation of the very wrongs the Act was designed to fix.
Batsa argued that in terms of section 16 of the Constitution, the prohibition limits the company’s right to engage in commercial expression and the right to freedom of expression of tobacco consumers.
They further argued that tobacco consumers were denied the right to receive information concerning tobacco products.
It sought a High Court order that the provision did not apply to one-on-one communication between tobacco manufacturers, importers, wholesalers and retailers, and consenting adult tobacco consumers.
Sale of tobacco products
Justice Farlam wrote that ‘all the communications which the appellant [BATSA] wishes to make are designed, in some way or other, to promote the sale of their products and thus maintain in place the mischief which the Act is designed to combat.’
NCAS, which had joined government as a friend of the court, welcomes the decision. ‘A comprehensive ban on tobacco advertising is critical in protecting young people from the clutches of the industry,’ reads a NCAS statement.
‘Tobacco advertising is designed to appeal to youth by portraying smoking as a cool, fun and pleasurable experience.
‘The NCAS considers the freedom of teenagers to grow up healthily as more important than the freedom of the tobacco companies to advertise a deadly addiction.’
Background to the case
Tobacco advertising was banned in 1999, through an amendment to the Tobacco Products Control Act of 1993 (the Act).
The cigarette companies seizing on an alleged loophole in the law switched their advertising budgets to social media and one-to-one advertising. It held ‘secret cigarette parties’ and use techniques such as ‘viral’ or ‘buzz’ marketing to continue to promote cigarettes.
In 2008, Parliament again amended the Act to outlaw these marketing tactics.
In 2009 Batsa applied to the North Gauteng High Court to declare the amendments to the Act as unconstitutional or alternately to interpret the Act in a manner which would allow it to continue advertising on a one-to-one basis.
In May 2011, the High Court rejected Batsa’s application and held the advertising ban to be constitutional.
BATSA then appealed against the High Court judgement in the Supreme Court of Appeal
In 2000, tobacco use caused 44 400 deaths in South Africa according to the Medical Research Council, this is equal to 8 to 9% of all deaths in the country.
Sources: National Council Against Smoking, Sapa
Author
Health-e News is South Africa's dedicated health news service and home to OurHealth citizen journalism. Follow us on Twitter @HealtheNews
View all posts
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Big tobacco’s challenge to smoking act fails
by Health-e News, Health-e News
June 21, 2012