New smoking law under attack
The proposed new amendments to the Tobacco Products Control Act will criminalise smoking in any building, outdoor venue, public or private beach, outdoor drinking or eating area, park, walkway, parking area, or within ten metres of any doorway or window.
According to Louw, the new regulation will ‘infringe disproportionately’ on the rights of individuals and private property owners.
‘Of concern to the FMF is the impact of the regulations on businesses, especially within the hospitality industry, incorporating restaurants, bars, nightclubs and casinos,’ Louw said.
The new regulations will render the provisions businesses had made such as enclosed smoking sections, or outside smoking areas at restaurants, obsolete.
Tobacco industry comment
In a recent statement the Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa (Tisa) also said that thought the new regulations to be too restrictive.
According to Tisa CEO Francois van der Merwe, the Tobacco Products Control Act 1993 made provision for the minister to prescribe regulations for designated indoor smoking areas, and now the draft regulations prohibited smoking indoors.
‘This, we believe, is not in line with the spirit and purpose of the act,’ said Van der Merwe.
British American Tobacco South Africa’s Head of Corporate and Regulatory Affairs, Mr Leslie Rance, said that although the company believed the regulation had a greater impact on non-tobacco industry organisations such as those in the hospitality sector, he felt it was necessary for the company to participate in the debate.
‘We believe that the government should allow the owners of businesses in the hospitality industry to continue making provisions for adult smokers as they account for a significant percentage of their revenue,’ said Rance.
Tightening smoking regulation
In 2007, lawmakers approved various changes that sought to close loopholes in the Tobacco Products Control Act of 1993. Just last month (June), the Supreme Court of Appeal upheld that law’s blanket ban on tobacco ads. It rejected a lawsuit brought by British American Tobacco SA, which had argued that the restrictions infringed on the company’s free speech rights.
Anti-smoking lobbyists were rejoiced by the Supreme Court of Appeal ruling and applaud the latest stringent proposals.
‘It goes the next step to protect health and we think it will work practically,’ said Peter Ucko, director of the National Council Against Smoking. Pro-smoking lobbyists argue that enforcing such a broad ban would be impossible, but Ucko insisted the laws will work. Since the 2007 regulations, ‘no one smokes in shopping malls anymore,’ he said.
If the new law were brought into effect, anyone convicted of puffing in a no-smoking zone would be liable to a R500 fine, while a person in control of an indoor public place where illicit smoking occurred could get a fine of up to R100 000.
Smoking in South Africa
There were some 7.7 million adult tobacco users in South Africa last year, lighting up an estimated 27 billion cigarettes, according to the Tobacco Institute of Southern Africa.
In 2000, tobacco use caused 44 400 deaths in South Africa according to the Medical Research Council, this is equal to 8 to 9% of all deaths in the country.
Sources: Sapa, NCAS
Author
-
Health-e News is South Africa's dedicated health news service and home to OurHealth citizen journalism. Follow us on Twitter @HealtheNews
View all posts
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
-
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
-
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
-
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
-
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
New smoking law under attack
by Health-e News, Health-e News
July 16, 2012