When breast cancer is detected by screening, it generally allows for earlier treatment and an improved prognosis. However, concerns have recently been raised about overdiagnosis ‘ where screening identifies a tumour, which is consequently treated by surgery, and often radiotherapy and medication, but which would have remained undetected for the rest of the woman’s life without causing illness if it had not been detected by screening.
The panel, led by Professor Sir Michael Marmot, Director of the Institute of Health Equity at University College, London, United Kingdom (UK), was set up to provide an independent review of the evidence for the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening in the UK.
The panel set out to analyse the best existing evidence for the effectiveness of breast cancer screening and the risks of over-diagnosis. They performed a meta-analysis of 11 randomised controlled trials assessing whether breast cancer screening results in fewer deaths due to the disease, compared to when no screening takes place. Overall, they found that women who are invited to breast cancer screening have a relative risk of dying from breast cancer that is 20 percent less than those who aren’t invited to screening.
Although the panel acknowledged several limitations to these studies ‘ not least the fact that all of them took place more than 20 years ago ‘ they nonetheless concluded that the evidence was sufficient to allow for an overall estimated relative risk reduction of 20 percent.
Despite a scarcity of reliable studies on overdiagnosis, the panel concluded that for the roughly 307 000 women aged between 50 and 52 years who are invited to begin screening every year, just over one percent will have an overdiagnosed cancer in the next 20 years.
Putting together benefit and overdiagnosis from the above figures, they estimate that for 10 000 UK women invited to screening from age 50 for 20 years, about 681 cancers will be found of which 129 will represent overdiagnosis, and 43 deaths from breast cancer will be prevented.
However, given the uncertainties around all of these estimates, the panel state that the figures quoted give a spurious impression of accuracy, and further research will be needed to more accurately assess the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening.
‘The reduction in risk of death from breast cancer screening corresponds to one breast cancer death prevented for every 235 women invited to screening, and one death averted for every 180 women who attend screening,’ said Marmot. ‘The breast screening programmes in the UK, which invite women aged 50 ‘ 70 years to screening every 3 years, probably prevent around 1 300 breast cancer deaths every year. However, our estimates also suggest that each year around 4 000 women are overdiagnosed as a result of screening.’
‘For each woman, the choice is clear. On the positive side, screening confers a reduction in the risk of mortality of breast cancer because of early detection and treatment. On the negative side, is the knowledge that she has perhaps a one percent chance of having a cancer diagnosed and treated that would never have caused problems if she had not been screened. Clear communication of these harms and benefits to women is essential, and the core of how a modern health system should function.’
Source: The Lancet
