Guinea pigs and misinformation – COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a growing threat
Tshepo Molai has been ignoring the emails and SMS’s from different medical insurance companies inviting him to register for the COVID-19 vaccine. Molai is one of a large number of South Africans showing vaccine hesitancy.
Vaccine hesitancy is the resistance of, or the delay in acceptance of the vaccination despite the availability of vaccination services. It also one of the ten greatest threats to global health , according to the World Health Organisation.
Molai, a 60-year-old Pretoria resident, has been vaccinated before but distrusts the technology used to develop the COVID-19 vaccine specifically. The pause of the Johnson and Johnson vaccine rollout, which was quickly resumed after tests showed it was safe to use, scared Molai.
“In my opinion, the new mRNA technology used to manufacture the vaccine has not been properly tested. The recent suspension of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine in America, and eventually in South Africa, due to the blood clots it caused to the few, is just one of the reflections of the trial and error basis that the side-effects are being monitored on. I am not willing to be a guinea pig to find out what further side effects there may be,” he said.
Molai, who heads up infrastructure and logistics for a mining company, has no problem with vaccines that have been used for decades but has doubts because he believes the COVID-19 shot was developed too quickly.
“I am not concerned about individual cases. What remains is that, initially when the vaccination roll-out started, the manufacturers didn’t know that there were going to be blood clots. The vaccine trials also did not show this as a possible effect, and then few months into the vaccination, there were blood clots. Nobody knows how prevalent other effects will be, so why would I expose myself?”
Vaccine hesitancy in SA
Since COVID-19 vaccine trials began in South Africa in June 2020, the attitude against its use in South Africa spread quickly. This was fuelled by the rise of fake news, mistrust in the government and a lack of information about the manufacturing process of the vaccine and its long-term side effects.
The University of Johannesburg, in partnership with the Human Sciences Research Council, published a survey on vaccine hesitancy in January. Sampling 10,000 people, the survey showd that that while 52% of people would definitely take the vaccine, there is a large number of people who are unsure about taking a vaccine.
Fifteen percent of participants don’t know if they would take a vaccine, 6% probably wouldn’t take a vaccine and 12% of people surveyed definitely would not take a vaccine, the survey found. Participants’ main concerns included potential side effects (25%), and effectiveness (18%) of the vaccines. Only 7% mentioned concerns relating to conspiracies, and 4% cited religious or occult issues with the vaccine.
Misinformation, fake news and conspiracy theories
In some instance, vaccine hesitancy in South Africa can also be linked to the history of Apartheid colonial rule. Historically, racist scientific practices have misused black bodies as testing sites for new technology.
Simnikiwe Kalimashe, 23, said that she will not be taking the vaccine because most of the information she has read from social media has convinced her that the vaccine is not safe.
“I mostly get my news from the internet and not from news channels. I’d say this may have influenced me in a negative way because most of what I have read has been discouraging me from believing that the vaccine was created in the interest of protecting Africans,” said the Pretoria citizen.
Kalimashe said that one of the rumors she came across was that the vaccine was a way to depopulate Africa.
In response to this misinformation, the Vaccine Literacy Manual compiled by Section27 dispels rumours like the one that Kalimashe came across. It explains that many African scientists and experts have been involved in the development of vaccines, and the participation of people from all over Africa in the trials attests to its safety for everyone who uses it.
Vaccine can keep people out of hospitals
Manager of the COVID-19 unit at and registered nurse at Kloof Hospital in Pretoria, Alta Matthee told Health-e News that her husband might still be alive if he had access to a COVID-19 vaccine.
“My husband was also an essential worker and was diagnosed with the coronavirus on the 26th of December 2020. He fought for his life but sadly lost it early this year on the 24th of January. If my husband had the opportunity to take the COVID-19 vaccine, I believe he would’ve still been here with me today. It is our responsibility to save ourselves,” she said.
Matthee urged people to protect their families, colleagues and strangers around them, by getting vaccinated when they get the opportunity to do so. In her work, Matthee sees a short supply of ventilators, medical equipment and exhausted staff. Vaccines, she said, would give people “fighting chance.”
Immunity is everyone’s responsibility
Mmaletsatsi Mamabolo, also a unit manager and nurse at Kloof Hospital in Pretoria, has received the COVID-19 vaccine and is encouraging others to do so too.
“As a healthcare worker for 26 years, I have seen the devastation caused by severe illnesses, especially during the HIV pandemic. This has always encouraged me to have a pro-vaccination attitude. I am one of the many healthcare workers who did not feel any COVID-19 symptoms after getting vaccinated, I was relieved to be able to do my work knowing I am protected,” she said.
Mamabolo said that achieving herd immunity in South Africa is everyone’s responsibility.
“Being in the forefront at work has made protecting my family and people around me not an option. I encourage people to continue practicing the safety regulations like wearing a mask, keeping a social distance and avoiding overcrowded places, in order to prevent a third wave.”—Health-e News
Author
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
-
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
-
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
-
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
-
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Guinea pigs and misinformation – COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a growing threat
by LililtaG, Health-e News
May 13, 2021