By Dr Munya Saruchera, Director – Africa Centre for Inclusive Health Management, Stellenbosch University

The Africa Centre for Inclusive Health Management commends the Institute for Economic Justice (IEJ), #PayTheGrants coalition, and other civil society organisations for their successful legal challenge leading to the Pretoria High Court’s landmark ruling on Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant regulations. This victory not only ensures greater inclusivity and fairness in social assistance but also highlights the critical role of advocacy in shaping public policies that promote equity and social justice.

The court’s decision and its implications

On January 24, 2025, the Pretoria High Court found several Social SRD grant regulations unconstitutional. Notably, the court invalidated the online-only application requirement, recognising that it excluded individuals without internet access. Additionally, the court deemed the fixed income threshold of R624 per month and the grant’s value insufficient, ordering the government to progressively increase both to align with inflation and the cost of living. The court also emphasised that gifts and one-time payments should be excluded from income assessments, ensuring that temporary financial assistance doesn’t disqualify applicants from receiving the grant.

Social assistance and health outcomes

The SRD grant, introduced in 2020 as a response to the economic challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, has been a lifeline for millions. Beyond its immediate financial relief, the grant plays a crucial role in health outcomes:

1. Improved Nutrition: Access to financial resources enables beneficiaries to afford nutritious food, directly impacting their health. A study by the University of Johannesburg found that households receiving the SRD grant reported an increase in the quantity and frequency of nutritious meals and reduced hunger.

2. Mental Health Benefits: Financial stress is a significant contributor to mental health issues. Research indicates that the SRD grant has positively impacted recipients’ mental well-being by reducing depressive symptoms associated with economic hardship.

3. Access to Healthcare Services: With additional financial resources, individuals are better positioned to afford transportation to healthcare facilities, purchase medications, and access other essential health services.

Advancing UHC through social grants

Universal health coverage (UHC) aims to ensure that all individuals have access to necessary health services without financial hardship. Social grants like the SRD play a pivotal role in this endeavour:

1. Reducing Barriers to Care: By alleviating financial constraints, grants enable individuals to seek timely medical attention, leading to early diagnosis and treatment of health conditions.

2. Promoting Preventative Health Measures: With improved financial stability, beneficiaries are more likely to engage in preventative health behaviours, such as proper nutrition and regular medical check-ups.

3. Enhancing Health Equity: Social grants help bridge the gap for marginalised populations, ensuring that vulnerable groups have equitable access to health services.

The path forward

The court’s ruling mandates that the government not only amend the SRD grant regulations to be more inclusive and recognises the broader impact of social assistance on public health. By aligning the grant’s value and eligibility criteria with the realities of inflation and living costs, and by facilitating easier access through in-person applications, the government can enhance both social welfare and health outcomes.

The Africa Centre for Inclusive Health Management supports this landmark decision, viewing it as a vital step toward addressing the intertwined challenges of poverty and health. 

______________________________________________________________________________________

The views and opinions expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author, who is not employed by Health-e News. Health-e News is committed to presenting diverse perspectives to enrich public discourse on health-related issues.