Rath may be in contempt of court
TAC Treasurer Nathan Geffen claimed in a letter, which was sent last month to Hogan, Director General Thami Mseleku and the health department’s Law Enforcement Agency ,that Rath was continuing to advertise medical claims about his products and distribute them, yet both activities were barred by a court order issued by the Cape High Court recently.
Most of his activities appear to be targeting KwaZulu-Natal, where he has distributors in Mtubatuba, Uthungulu, KwaMashu, Ntuzuma and Ethekwini. There are also indications that distribution networks have been set up in Durban’s Lamontville and New Germany as well as Gauteng, Geffen said in the letter.
Geffen described how a TAC member had visited a distribution centre in Durban in July (after the judgment) where she was told it would be possible to purchase Rath’s therapies.
The TAC member was also allegedly told that the Rath remedies had been passed as safe and effective by the Medicines Control Council and the Medical Research Council.
The TAC had received information that a new shipment of Rath products had arrived in Durban as late as September.
Geffen said the TAC had also been alerted to ongoing Rath activities in KwaZulu-Natal by the HIV Clinicians Society. He said he had photographic evidence that Rath’s medicines were being sold as an alternative to antiretroviral (ARV) medicines as well as newspaper articles dissuading patients from taking ARVs.
Geffen’s letter warns that the health department had a duty to conform to Judge Zondi’s court order as well as the duties of the Medicines and Related Substances Control Act of 1965 by ensuring that ‘Matthias Rath’s unlawful activities are ended’.
Hogan’s spokesperson Fidel Hadebe said he was confident that the matter would be receiving attention if it had been sent to the minister and Mseleku, but he was unable to confirm this as they were in Durban participating in World AIDS Day activities.
Author
-
Health-e News is South Africa's dedicated health news service and home to OurHealth citizen journalism. Follow us on Twitter @HealtheNews
View all posts
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
-
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
-
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
-
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
-
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Rath may be in contempt of court
by Health-e News, Health-e News
December 2, 2008