Controversial policy to regulate doctors on hold
In late May, President Jacob Zuma signed into law long-dormant sections of the National Health Act that would give the Director General of Health the power to deny doctors operating licenses depending on where in the country the medical professional wished to operate, or open or expand a practice.
Following Zuma’s promulgation, doctors would have had to apply to the Department of Health for a “certificate of need,” or permission to work in an area, by 1 April 2016.
Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi says that the introduction of Certificates of Need is meant to address health inequalities between rural and urban areas.
“(Netcare) Park Lane Clinic has more gynaes than Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces put together,” Motsoaledi says in the South African Medical Journal, which is published by the South African Medical Association (SAMA). “It will be difficult to force them to move – but should we allow more gynaes to move into that small space called Park Lane? I don’t think so.”
SAMA, the South African Dental Association, and the specialist body, the South African Private Practitioners Forum have all vocally opposed Certificates of Need and were considering Constitutional Court litigation against the department over the matter.
Consultations prompt a re-think but not a redrafting of policy
[quote float=”right”]“The intention is not to redraft the Act but to allow parties sufficient time to engage with regulations before the act takes effect”
Director General Precious Matsoso has been consulting with doctors and health professionals on the matter. According to Department of Health Spokesperson Joe Maila, feedback from the consultations informed the department’s decision to withdraw the proclamation.
“(The director general) consulted interested parties extensively over the past few weeks,” he said. “Interested parties requested that we allow adequate time for the drafting of regulations and subsequent engagement, first arguing that the 24-month time limit in the act would unfairly pressurise them.”
“The (director general) considered their submission, which led to the decision to request the withdrawal,” he added.
SAMA has welcomed what spokesperson Dr Mzukisi Grootboom called a “stay of execution”, which he attributes to advice from the state attorney.
“It became quite clear when we engaged with the department that they had been given some wrong advice, which I think is a pity,” he said. “The way those sections (of the National Health Act) have been written is problematic.”
“What needs to happen next is that they must go back to Parliament and someone has got to write them properly,” said Grootboom, who added that, while introducing regulations would help clarify some of the sections, they would not address fundamental flaws in the legislation.
However Maila says the department does not plan to re-write the sections.
“The intention is not to redraft the Act but to allow parties sufficient time to engage with regulations before the act takes effect,” he told Health-e News. “The next step is to draft regulations and allow interested parties to engage with them before the act takes effect. This is essentially a process issue.”
In a statement, Democratic Alliance Shadow Minister of Health Wilmot James has echoed SAMA’s call for the matter to return to Parliament for further discussion.
An edited version of this article first appeared in The Mercury newspaper
Author
Republish this article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles for free under a Creative Commons license. Here’s what you need to know:
-
You have to credit Health-e News. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication.” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Health-e News.” You must link the word “Health-e News” to the original URL of the story.
-
You must include all of the links from our story, including our newsletter sign up link.
-
If you use canonical metadata, please use the Health-e News URL. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
-
You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week”)
-
You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Health-e News understands that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties automatically summarise or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
-
You can’t republish our material wholesale, or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
-
If you share republished stories on social media, we’d appreciate being tagged in your posts. You can find us on Twitter @HealthENews, Instagram @healthenews, and Facebook Health-e News Service.
You can grab HTML code for our stories easily. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our stories. You’ll find it with the other share buttons.
If you have any other questions, contact info@health-e.org.za.
Controversial policy to regulate doctors on hold
by lauralopez, Health-e News
July 31, 2014